Recent study revealed that couples who are trying to conceive prefer to exhaust thousands of pounds for the treatment. And still they are unable to get desired results plus they are at a risk of side effects.
Instead, they must go in for less invasive techniques. It is not only cheat but also result oriented.
Fertility experts tagged the fertility industry as ‘commercializing’ the treatment and resisting safer alternatives, which are less lucrative. Geeta Nargund, an IVF doctor said,
Women are under the impression that more drugs, more eggs and more embryos mean better success rates. This is scientific evidence that that isn’t true.
Almost 30,000 couples have IVF in Britain every year and average success rates are 28.2% Natural IVF, also know as mild stimulation IVF, uses a single embryo implanted when the woman ovulates naturally after taking a low dose of artificial hormones. In standard IVF, two embryos are usually implanted after the ovaries are stimulated with large doses of hormones, which risks menopausal-type symptoms and depression.
Doctors in the Netherlands discovered that the mild form was just as effective.
Findings have been based on the study of 404 women, who were under 38, half of whom underwent standard treatment and the other half-mild IVF. After a year, 43.4% of those undergoing mild IVF were pregnant, compared with 44.7% of those on standard treatment.
On average, the mild form takes four cycles to produce a pregnancy, compared with three in regular IVF. But the researchers say it is cheaper and is more healthy for the mother to undergo.
Hence, all those who are planning for an IVF, the better judgment would be to go in for cheaper and reliable treatments.
Image
Read